System, method, and computer program product for monitoring an execution flow of a function

ABSTRACT

A system, method, and computer program product are provided for monitoring an execution flow of a function. In use, data associated with a function is identified within a call stack. Additionally, a call stack frame is determined from freed memory in the call stack. Further, an execution flow of the function is monitored, utilizing the call stack frame from the freed memory.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to monitoring system activity, and moreparticularly to behavioral monitoring and analysis.

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, security software may depend on the ability to widelymonitor system activity. This may be particularly important forbehavioral analysis methods for detecting malicious activity. One usefulcomponent of this monitoring may include monitoring the flow of softwareexecution. For example, security software may monitor execution flow inorder to determine if code involved in handling a monitored operation istrusted and expected to be involved in the handling of the operation.However, traditional methodologies for monitoring software executionflow have generally exhibited various limitations.

For example, the ability to monitor the flow of software execution isoften limited. For instance, in particular versions of operatingsystems, the use of interface hooking may be prohibited in the kernel.Additionally, in another example, there may be a performance impact ofapplying a necessary level of monitoring in order to assemble anexecution flow profile. There is thus a need for addressing these and/orother issues associated with the prior art.

SUMMARY

A system, method, and computer program product are provided formonitoring an execution flow of a function. In use, data associated witha function is identified within a call stack. Additionally, a call stackframe is determined from freed memory in the call stack. Further, anexecution flow of the function is monitored, utilizing the call stackframe from the freed memory.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a network architecture, in accordance with oneembodiment.

FIG. 2 shows a representative hardware environment that may beassociated with the servers and/or clients of FIG. 1, in accordance withone embodiment.

FIG. 3 shows a method for monitoring an execution flow of a function, inaccordance with another embodiment.

FIG. 4 shows a method for performing execution flow monitoring usingenhanced call stack analysis, in accordance with yet another embodiment.

FIG. 5 shows a method for performing extended call stack analysis, inaccordance with still another embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 illustrates a network architecture 100, in accordance with oneembodiment. As shown, a plurality of networks 102 is provided. In thecontext of the present network architecture 100, the networks 102 mayeach take any form including, but not limited to a local area network(LAN), a wireless network, a wide area network (WAN) such as theInternet, peer-to-peer network, etc.

Coupled to the networks 102 are servers 104 which are capable ofcommunicating over the networks 102. Also coupled to the networks 102and the servers 104 is a plurality of clients 106. Such servers 104and/or clients 106 may each include a desktop computer, lap-topcomputer, hand-held computer, mobile phone, personal digitalassistant'(PDA), peripheral (e.g. printer, etc.), any component of acomputer, and/or any other type of logic. In order to facilitatecommunication among the networks 102, at least one gateway 108 isoptionally coupled therebetween.

FIG. 2 shows a representative hardware environment that may beassociated with the servers 104 and/or clients 106 of FIG. 1, inaccordance with one embodiment. Such figure illustrates a typicalhardware configuration of a workstation in accordance with oneembodiment having a central processing unit 210, such as amicroprocessor, and a number of other units interconnected via a systembus 212.

The workstation shown in FIG. 2 includes a Random Access Memory (RAM)214, Read Only Memory (ROM) 216, an I/O adapter 218 for connectingperipheral devices such as disk storage units 220 to the bus 212, a userinterface adapter 222 for connecting a keyboard 224, a mouse 226, aspeaker 228, a microphone 232, and/or other user interface devices suchas a touch screen (not shown) to the bus 212, communication adapter 234for connecting the workstation to a communication network 235 (e.g., adata processing network) and a display adapter 236 for connecting thebus 212 to a display device 238.

The workstation may have resident thereon any desired operating system.It will be appreciated that an embodiment may also be implemented onplatforms and operating systems other than those mentioned. Oneembodiment may be written using JAVA, C, and/or C++ language, or otherprogramming languages, along with an object oriented programmingmethodology. Object oriented programming (OOP) has become increasinglyused to develop complex applications.

Of course, the various embodiments set forth herein may be implementedutilizing hardware, software, or any desired combination thereof. Forthat matter, any type of logic may be utilized which is capable ofimplementing the various functionality set forth herein.

FIG. 3 shows a method 300 for monitoring an execution flow of afunction, in accordance with another embodiment. As an option, themethod 300 may be carried out in the context of the architecture andenvironment of FIGS. 1 and/or 2. Of course, however, the method 300 maybe carried out in any desired environment.

As shown in operation 302, data associated with a function is identifiedwithin a call stack. In one embodiment, the function may be associatedwith an instance of software. For example, the function may include asubroutine of the software (e.g. an active subroutine of the software,etc.). Additionally, in one embodiment, the call stack may include anydata structure that stores the data associated with the function. Forexample, the call stack may include a plurality of entries, where one ormore entries are associated with an action performed by the function.

In yet another embodiment, the data may include any information withinthe call stack that is associated with the function. For example, thedata may include an entry (e.g., a frame, etc.) in the call stack. Inone embodiment, the entry may include a return address, and the returnaddress may identify the function that pushed the entry onto the callstack. In another embodiment, the entry may include a snapshot of astate associated with the function. For example, the entry may includeone or more preserved local variables, one or more spaces reserved inthe call stack for variables, one or more registers, etc.

Additionally, in one embodiment, the data associated with a function maybe associated with an event. For example, the data may be identifiedwithin the call stack as the result of generating a test event (e.g., atrace event. etc.). For instance, a test event may be generated in orderto determine one or more functions that are involved with a call stackassociated with the test event (e.g., by identifying one or morefunctions that push or pop one or more entries onto the call stackassociated with the test event, etc.).

Further, in another embodiment, the data associated with the functionmay be identified by monitoring the call stack. For example, hookingbased monitoring of the call stack may be used to identify the dataassociated with the function. In yet another embodiment, the monitoringof the call stack may be dynamically adjusted. Of course, however, themonitoring may be performed in any manner.

Further still, as shown in operation 304, a call stack frame isdetermined from freed memory in the call stack. In one embodiment, thecall stack frame may be associated with a stack entry. For example, thecall stack frame may include memory in the stack that previously held anactive stack entry. In another example, an entry that is pushed onto thestack may become the call stack frame in the freed memory in the stackwhen the entry is popped from the stack. In another embodiment, the callstack frame may include memory outside of that dictated by the callstack (e.g., an external call stack frame, etc.). For example, the callstack frame may include memory outside (e.g., below, etc.) a stackpointer associated with the call stack.

In addition, in one embodiment, the call stack frame may be associatedwith a first call stack entry of the function. For example, the functionmay push a first call stack entry onto the call stack, and the firstcall stack entry may then be popped (e.g., by another function, etc.),where the popped first call stack entry becomes the call stack frame infreed memory in the stack. In another embodiment, the call stack framemay be associated with a second call stack entry of the function. Forexample, after the first call stack entry is popped, the function maypush a second call stack entry onto the call stack, where the memoryused to store the second call stack entry includes the call stack frame.

Also, as shown in operation 306, an execution flow of the function ismonitored, utilizing the call stack frame from the freed memory. In oneembodiment, monitoring the execution flow of the function may includemonitoring the call stack frame from the freed memory in the call stack.For example, a monitoring point (e.g., a hook, etc.) may be placed onthe call stack frame. In another example, the monitoring point mayidentify code involved in the handling of the test event. In yet anotherembodiment, the monitoring of the execution flow of the function may bedynamically adjusted, based on the call stack frame. For example,monitoring the execution flow of the function may include enablingadditional monitoring, based on an analysis of the call stack frame.

Furthermore, in another embodiment, it may be determined whether thecall stack frame has been compromised. For example, it may be determinedwhether the contents of the call stack frame have been overwritten by asecond call stack entry subsequent to a first call stack entry in thecall stack frame. In another embodiment, the determination whether thecall stack frame has been compromised may include examining codeassociated with the call stack frame (e.g., code preceding a returnaddress in the call stack frame, etc.). In yet another embodiment, alevel of confidence associated with the call stack frame may bedetermined. Further, in one embodiment, it may be determined whether thecall stack frame is compromised, based on the level of confidence.

Further still, in yet another embodiment, the call stack frame may notbe monitored if the call stack frame is determined to be compromised. Inanother embodiment, the call stack frame may be monitored if the callstack frame is determined to be not compromised. Additionally, dataassociated with the function within the call stack may again beidentified, utilizing the call stack frame from freed memory in the callstack. In another embodiment, the execution flow of the function may bemonitored for malware. Of course, however, the execution flow of thefunction may be monitored for any purpose.

In this way, monitoring the execution flow of the function may not belimited by a current call stack window, and may take advantage of freedmemory in the call stack. Additionally, confidence may be establishedthat data in freed memory in the call stack has not been overwritten.Further, the monitoring may allow for determining if a handling ofevents is performed by expected and trusted software. For example, agenerated keystroke test event may be expected to be handled only by asubset of OS-supplied software. If the monitoring indicates that thatother software was involved in this handling, one or more actions may betaken. For example, the monitoring could flag the involvement as outsideallowed system operations, possibly indicating a presence of malicioussoftware, etc. In another example, the system may be subjected toadditional scrutiny (e.g., enhanced monitoring, full scans, audits,etc.) in order to attempt to locate any malicious software that ispresent. In yet another example, the system may be placed in aquarantine area until the system is confirmed cleaned of malicioussoftware.

FIG. 4 shows a method 400 for performing execution flow monitoring usingenhanced call stack analysis, in accordance with another embodiment. Asan option, the method 400 may be carried out in the context of thearchitecture and environment of FIGS. 1-3. Of course, however, themethod 400 may be carried out in any desired environment.

As shown in operation 402, a scope of monitoring to be performed isdetermined. In one embodiment, determining the scope of the monitoringmay include generating a test event. For example, a test event may begenerated, and the monitoring may be limited to the handling of the testevent. In this way, the test event may artificially induce a limitedscope, and may thereby enable a simpler identification of eventsassociated with the scope. In another embodiment, the test event may beassociated with a specific thread, and handling of the test event mayoccur within the thread.

Additionally, as shown in operation 404, the monitoring is dynamicallyadjusted. In one embodiment, the monitoring may be adjusted according tothe determination of the scope of the monitoring. Additionally, see, forexample, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/111,851 filed Apr. 29,2008, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, andwhich describes dynamically adjusted systems monitoring and test/traceevents. In one embodiment, an optional test event may be used inassociation with dynamically adjusting the monitoring.

Further, as shown in operation 406, monitoring of callbacks is invoked.For example, monitoring may be invoked for callbacks that are identifiedas a result of the dynamic adjustments. Additionally, see, for example,U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/857,373 filed Sep. 18, 2007, andU.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/042,923 filed Mar. 5, 2008, whichare hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, and which describemethods for determining origins of code. Further, see, for example, U.S.patent application Ser. No. 12/202,952 filed Sep. 2, 2008, which ishereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, and which describes anexemplary behavioral detection infrastructure. Further still, see, forexample, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/415,641 filed Mar. 31,2009, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, andwhich describes exemplary use of an early boot environment for earlysystems monitoring.

In one embodiment, the monitoring may include operating system supportedmonitoring. For example, the monitoring may include the use of filterdrivers (e.g., file system filters, etc.), event callbacks (e.g.registry monitoring callbacks, etc.), etc. In another embodiment, themonitoring may include the use of code hooking. For example, themonitoring may include modifying code to be monitored so that ittransfers control to a callback when executed. In yet anotherembodiment, the monitoring may include the use of central processingunit (CPU) debugging extensions. For example, a limited number ofCPU-based monitors may be registered to invoke callbacks when indicatedcode is executed. Also, in still another embodiment, the monitoring mayinclude the use of virtualization extensions. For example, extensions toa virtualization system may be used to support invocation of a callbackwhen monitored code is executed.

Further still, as shown in decision 408, it is determined whether acallback is within a scope of the monitoring. In one embodiment, it maybe determined whether an element of execution (e.g. a thread, etc.)associated with the callback is within the scope of the monitoring. Ifin decision 408 it is determined that the callback is not within thescope of the monitoring, then monitoring of callbacks is again invokedin operation 406.

However, if in decision 408 it is determined that the callback is withinthe scope of the monitoring, then in operation 410, a call stack for theoperation that triggered the monitoring callback is extracted andexamined. In one embodiment, examining the call stack may includeperforming an extended call stack analysis on the call stack.Additionally, as shown in operation 412, additional monitoring isenabled as indicated by the examination of the call stack. For example,enabling the additional monitoring may include placing one or moreadditional monitoring points (e.g., hooks, probes, etc.) in the callstack or the freed memory in the call stack. In one embodiment, theadditional monitoring may include dynamically adjusted monitoring. Inthis way, a more comprehensive view of call stack frames not visiblefrom the callbacks of the initial level of monitoring may be provided.

Further, as shown in decision 414, it is determined whether a subsequenttest event is needed. For example, it may be determined whether theadditional monitoring that was enabled in operation 412 constitutes oneor more subsequent test events. If it is determined in decision 414 thata subsequent test event is needed, then monitoring of callbacks is againinvoked in operation 406. However, if in it is determined in decision414 that a subsequent test event is not needed, then in operation 416the additional monitoring enabled in operation 412 is disabled. In thisway, test event monitoring may conclude, and any additional monitoringpoints used during the monitoring may be reused in a dynamic manner.Additionally, the scope of test event monitoring may be selectivelyenabled and controlled.

FIG. 5 shows a method 500 for performing extended call stack analysis,in accordance with another embodiment. As an option, the method 500 maybe carried out in the context of the architecture and environment ofFIGS. 1-4. Of course, however, the method 500 may be carried out in anydesired environment.

As shown in operation 502, stack analysis of a call stack is performed.In one embodiment, performing the stack analysis may include identifyingone or more call frames of the call stack by performing a stack walk.For example, stack frames may be discovered by walking back in the stackwhen stack frame pointers are not present. Additionally, see, forexample, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/749,635 filed May 16, 2007,which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, and whichdescribes behavioral stack walking. In another embodiment, performingthe stack analysis may include extracting a call return address from anidentified call frame. Further, in yet another embodiment, performingthe stack analysis may include identifying an origin of code containingthe return address.

Additionally, as shown in operation 504, extended call stack analysis isperformed. In one embodiment, performing extended call stack analysismay include identifying a current top of the call stack. For example,the call stack may grow from top to bottom as functions are called, andmay shrink from bottom to top as functions return. In anotherembodiment, performing extended call stack analysis may include movingthrough freed stack memory. In yet another embodiment, such freed stackmemory may be analyzed in an attempt to identify one or more preservedcall stack frames in the freed stack memory.

Also, in one embodiment, the extended call stack analysis may examinefreed stack memory due to the fact that freeing of stack memory does notnecessarily overwrite its contents. Additionally, stack memory may notbe deallocated upon freeing. Instead, the stack pointer may be simplymoved to make the freed stack memory unavailable via normal stack usage,and the stack data may be preserved unless overwritten later. In anotherembodiment, even if the stack does grow back over the memory it may notall be overwritten (e.g., if memory is reserved but not used, etc.).

Further, as shown in operation 506, a candidate stack frame isidentified as a result of the extended call analysis. For example, acandidate stack frame may be selected from the freed stack memory.Further still, as shown in operation 508, an amount of confidenceassociated with the candidate stack frame is determined. In oneembodiment, a suspected call return address may be extracted from thecandidate call stack frame. Additionally, in another embodiment, it maybe determined whether the suspected call return address points to code.Further, in yet another embodiment, the code pointed to by the suspectedcall return address may be analyzed. For example, the code may beexamined for a preceding call that may explain the invocation of thecandidate stack frame. For instance, the preceding call may be a call tothe candidate stack frame, another stack frame, etc.

Further still, in another embodiment, it may be determined whether thecandidate stack frame includes a stack frame link. For example, it maybe determined whether the candidate stack frame contains a link (e.g., apointer, etc.) to another stack frame. In yet another embodiment,extended call stack analysis may be performed on a stack frame linked toby the stack frame link of the candidate stack frame. In this way,analysis may be repeated on additional potentially linked stack frames.

In yet another embodiment, an aggregate of the aforementioned analysismay determine a level of confidence associated with the candidate stackframe. For example, the level of confidence may be associated with adetermination of whether the candidate call stack frame is genuine. Forexample, if it is determined that a suspected call return address pointsto code, and the code includes a call to the candidate stack frame, ahigh level of confidence may be associated with the candidate stackframe. Additionally, in another example, if the candidate stack framecontains a link to another stack frame, and the other stack frame can beverified, then a high level of confidence may be associated with thecandidate stack frame.

Also, as shown in decision 510, it is determined whether a sufficientamount of confidence is associated with the candidate stack frame. Inone embodiment, the amount of confidence associated with the candidatestack frame may be compared to a threshold amount, and the amount ofconfidence associated with the candidate stack frame may be determinedto be sufficient if such amount is greater than the threshold amount. Inanother embodiment, the threshold amount may be dynamically determined,predetermined by a user, etc.

In addition, if it is determined in decision 510 that a sufficientamount of confidence is not associated with the candidate stack frame,then in operation 512 the candidate stack frame is disregarded. However,if in decision 510 it is determined that a sufficient amount ofconfidence is associated with the candidate stack frame, then inoperation 514 additional monitoring is placed in order to validate thecandidate stack frame. Also, the additional monitoring may allow forobservation of additional transient call stack frames. In anotherembodiment, a secondary test event may be created, and it may bedetermined whether the additional monitoring points are triggered in thesecondary test event.

In one embodiment, one or more additional monitoring points may beplaced in association with the candidate stack frame. In anotherembodiment, the targets of additional monitoring may be determined in amultitude of ways. In one example, monitoring may be placed within codepointed to by the suspected call return address, and it may bedetermined whether the candidate stack frame is created when thesecondary test event is processed. For instance, code preceding a callreturn address extracted from the candidate stack frame may be examined.In another example, the examination may not stop at the first callidentified, but may continue for more of the code preceding the returnaddress. Additionally, the examination may also go forward from thereturn address to identify other monitoring points.

In another embodiment, execution monitoring may be performed on themaker of the call, or the target of the call. Performing executionmonitoring on the target of the call may allow for more code paths to becovered by a single execution monitor, which may prove beneficial if anumber of allowed monitors is limited (e.g., in CPU debuggingextensions, etc.). In yet another embodiment, the targets of additionalmonitoring may be determined by the identification of a body of codeassociated with an observed call frame. For example, code that is partof an interface may be identified through stack analysis as having beeninvoked.

In one embodiment, in cases where a chain of calls is made and thenrolled directly back as the called functions return, the stack data maybe entirely preserved for analysis. Additionally, in another embodiment,if in the midst of the rollback additional calls were made, portions ofthe earlier stack data may be overwritten as the stack grows back down.Also, on return from these functions, the stack data from theirinvocation may be preserved instead of the earlier data.

Therefore, assembling an execution may require monitoring from severalpoints in order to put together a picture of transient call stacks. Thismay include dynamically adjusting monitoring points in order to bettercapture stack frames and validate stack frame candidates identifiedwithin the extended stack analysis. In this way, dynamically adjustedsystems monitoring, particularly when combined with the use of testevents, may allow for heightened monitoring that may mitigate aperformance impact. Additionally, dynamically applied executionmonitoring may result from the stack analysis as well as the extendedanalysis. For example, with stack analysis, the stack grown and shrinksas call chains are made and then rolled back, and applying additionalmonitoring may allow viewing of these transient call stack states.

In this way, forensic analysis may be used to discover call stack framesfrom data left in freed stack memory. Additionally, a combination ofcall stack analysis and extended call stack analysis may be used toassemble a picture of an execution flow of a handling of one or moretest events. Further, a variety of base enabling technologies may beused to provide a generation of data for analysis. Further still,dynamically applied monitoring may be used to assemble a more completepicture of an execution flow and may be used to mitigate an impact of amonitoring system.

While various embodiments have been described above, it should beunderstood that they have been presented by way of example only, and notlimitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of a preferred embodiment shouldnot be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, butshould be defined only in accordance with the following claims and theirequivalents.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer program product embodied on a tangiblecomputer readable medium, comprising: computer code for identifying dataassociated with a function within a call stack; computer code fordetermining a call stack frame from freed memory in the call stack; andcomputer code for monitoring an execution flow of the function,utilizing the call stack frame from the freed memory.
 2. The computerprogram product of claim 1, wherein the function is associated with aninstance of software.
 3. The computer program product of claim 1,wherein the data includes an entry in the call stack.
 4. The computerprogram product of claim 3, wherein the entry includes a return addressthat identifies a function that pushed the entry onto the call stack. 5.The computer program product of claim 1, wherein the computer programproduct is operable such that the data is identified within the callstack as a result of generating a test event.
 6. The computer programproduct of claim 1, wherein the computer program product is operablesuch that the data associated with the function is identified bymonitoring the call stack.
 7. The computer program product of claim 1,wherein the computer program product is operable such that hooking basedmonitoring of the call stack is used to identify the data associatedwith the function.
 8. The computer program product of claim 1, whereinthe call stack frame includes memory in the stack that previously heldan active stack entry.
 9. The computer program product of claim 1,wherein the call stack frame includes memory below a stack pointerassociated with the call stack.
 10. The computer program product ofclaim 1, wherein monitoring the execution flow of the function includesmonitoring the call stack frame from the freed memory in the call stack.11. The computer program product of claim 10, wherein the computerprogram product is operable such that a monitoring point is placed onthe call stack frame.
 12. The computer program product of claim 11,wherein the computer program product is operable such that themonitoring point identifies code involved in the handling of a testevent.
 13. The computer program product of claim 1, wherein the computerprogram product is operable such that the monitoring of the executionflow of the function is dynamically adjusted, based on the call stackframe.
 14. The computer program product of claim 1, wherein monitoringthe execution flow of the function includes enabling additionalmonitoring, based on an analysis of the call stack frame.
 15. Thecomputer program product of claim 1, wherein the computer programproduct is operable such that it is determined whether the contents ofthe call stack frame have been overwritten by a second call stack entrysubsequent to a first call stack entry in the call stack frame.
 16. Thecomputer program product of claim 1, wherein the computer programproduct is operable such that a level of confidence associated with thecall stack frame is determined.
 17. The computer program product ofclaim 16, wherein the computer program product is operable such that itis determined whether the call stack frame is compromised, based on thelevel of confidence.
 18. A method, comprising: identifying dataassociated with a function within a call stack; determining a call stackframe from freed memory in the call stack; and monitoring an executionflow of the function, utilizing the call stack frame from the freedmemory.
 19. A system, comprising: a processor for identifying dataassociated with a function within a call stack, determining a call stackframe from freed memory in the call stack, and monitoring an executionflow of the function, utilizing the call stack frame from the freedmemory.
 20. The system of claim 19, wherein the processor is coupled tosystem memory via a bus.